Embarking on the journey of finding the perfect running shoe can be as exhilarating as the run itself. And today we’ll be comparing the Saucony Ride vs Brooks Glycerin. In this comprehensive comparison, we slip on these running shoes, exploring crucial aspects such as weight, stack height, and their suitability for various running styles.
Uncover the key takeaways, pros, and cons, as we dissect the Saucony Ride’s upgraded PWRRUN+ midsole against the Brooks Glycerin’s DNA Loft v3 technology. Whether you prioritize a well-cushioned ride with speed or classic comfort for diverse runs, this guide aims to help you make an informed decision on the ideal companion for your miles.
Key Takeaways: Saucony Ride vs Brooks Glycerin
Weight:
- Saucony Ride: 9.9 oz. (M9) / 8.4 oz. (W7.5)
- Brooks Glycerin: 10.1 oz. (M9) / 8.9 oz. (W7.5)
Stack Height/Drop:
- Saucony Ride: 35mm heel, 27mm forefoot (8mm drop)
- Brooks Glycerin: 38mm heel, 28mm forefoot (10mm drop)
Best For:
- Saucony Ride: Well-cushioned miles with speed
- Brooks Glycerin: Classic cushioned comfort for various runs
Pros:
- Saucony Ride:
- Smooth ride, balanced transition
- Wider midfoot platform for stability
- Upgraded PWRRUN+ midsole for soft, responsive cushioning
- Improved outsole traction
- Brooks Glycerin:
- DNA Loft v3 midsole for soft, bouncy cushioning
- Redesigned outsole enhances transitions
- Suitable for various types of runs
Cons:
- Saucony Ride:
- Similar to Triumph, lacing system issues, potential heel tab quality-control problem
- Brooks Glycerin:
- May feel blocky due to substantial outsole rubber
- Limited responsiveness compared to other nitrogen-infused midsoles
- Potential blister issues
Conclusion:
- Saucony Ride: Solid daily trainer with soft, responsive PWRRUN+ midsole; ideal for well-cushioned daily training or recovery.
- Brooks Glycerin: Comfortable daily trainer with plush DNA Loft v3 midsole; suitable for various runs, prioritizing classic, cushioned comfort.
Saucony Ride
Saucony Ride
- Weight: 9.9 oz. (282 g) for a US M9, 8.4 oz. (238 g) for a US W7.5
- Stack Height/Drop: 35 mm in heel, 27 mm in forefoot (8 mm drop)
- Best For: Well-cushioned miles with a bit of speed
- Key Features: Upgraded PWRRUN+ midsole, airy engineered mesh upper, improved outsole coverage
- Price: $140
Overview
The Saucony Ride has undergone significant changes, featuring an upgraded PWRRUN+ midsole and an airy engineered mesh upper. It caters to those seeking well-cushioned miles with a touch of speed.
Fit
The Saucony Ride provides a very comfortable ride with a smooth transition from heel to toe. The wider midfoot platform enhances stability, and the new engineered mesh upper offers breathability. The gusseted tongue and comfortable heel collar contribute to an overall snug and comfortable fit. However, some users have reported issues with the lacing system, with tabs coming loose during tying.
Performance
The ride is smooth, reminiscent of the Saucony Triumph. The transition from heel to toe is balanced, and the platform’s width at the midfoot provides decent medial and lateral stability. The upgraded PWRRUN+ midsole offers a good blend of soft cushioning and responsiveness, making it suitable for various types of runs. The improved outsole traction adds to the overall positive performance, especially on the road.
Pros
- Smooth ride with a balanced transition.
- Wider midfoot platform for stability.
- Upgraded PWRRUN+ midsole provides soft cushioning and responsiveness.
- Improved outsole traction.
Cons
- Similar to the Triumph, making it challenging to distinguish between the two.
- Lacing system tends to come loose during tying.
- Potential quality-control issue with the heel tab.
Conclusion
The Saucony Ride is a solid daily trainer with a soft and responsive PWRRUN+ midsole. It’s suitable for those who prefer a well-cushioned ride for daily training or recovery days.
Brooks Glycerin
Brooks Glycerin
- Weight: 10.1 oz. (286 g.) for a US M9 / 8.9 oz. (252 g.) for a US W7.5
- Midsole: Solid slab of DNA Loft v3
- Stack Height/Drop: 38mm heel, 28mm forefoot (10mm drop)
- Notable Changes: Incorporation of DNA Loft v3
- Price: $160
Overview
The Brooks Glycerin introduces DNA Loft v3, a nitrogen-infused foam, for a cushioned and comfortable daily trainer. It targets runners seeking classic, cushioned comfort for various types of runs.
Fit
The Brooks Glycerin is designed for a comfortable fit with its airy mesh upper that provides breathability. The ample cushioning around the collar and tongue enhances the step-in feel, contributing to an overall comfortable experience. However, some users have reported issues with the fit, including a roomy toe box and potential blister problems.
Performance
The Glycerin offers a cushioned and comfortable ride, suitable for recovery days to long runs. The DNA Loft v3 midsole provides a soft and bouncy feel, although it may feel blocky at times due to the substantial rubber on the outsole. The redesigned outsole improves transitions, and the shoe is considered a durable option for various running activities.
Pros
- DNA Loft v3 midsole offers a soft and bouncy cushioning experience.
- Comfortable fit with airy mesh upper.
- Redesigned outsole enhances transitions.
- Suitable for various types of runs.
Cons
- May feel blocky due to substantial rubber on the outsole.
- Limited responsiveness compared to other nitrogen-infused midsoles.
- Some users may experience blister issues.
Conclusion
The Brooks Glycerin excels as a comfortable daily trainer with the DNA Loft v3 midsole. It’s ideal for runners seeking a plush and cushioned experience for their runs.
Final Summary – Saucony Ride vs Brooks
In summary, when comparing the Saucony Ride vs Brooks Glycerin, both offer distinct qualities catering to various preferences.
The Saucony Ride stands out for its smooth ride, well-balanced transition, and upgraded PWRRUN+ midsole, making it an excellent choice for runners seeking a daily trainer with a soft yet responsive cushioning experience. It excels in providing stability through its wider midfoot platform and is suitable for those who prioritize well-cushioned miles, making it an ideal option for daily training or recovery days.
On the other hand, the Brooks Glycerin introduces the DNA Loft v3 midsole, offering a plush and comfortable feel for runners desiring classic, cushioned comfort. While it may lack the same level of responsiveness as some other nitrogen-infused midsoles, the Glycerin is a reliable choice for a variety of runs, particularly for those seeking durability and long-lasting comfort.
Which One Should You Buy
For runners focused on a versatile and responsive daily trainer, the Saucony Ride is recommended. Its upgraded features and overall performance make it suitable for individuals looking to balance comfort with a bit of speed.
If maximum cushioning and classic comfort are top priorities, the Brooks Glycerin is an excellent option. Its DNA Loft v3 midsole delivers a soft and bouncy experience, making it an ideal choice for runners who prioritize a plush feel on their runs.
For Soft and Responsive Daily Training:
- Saucony Ride 17: Ideal for those who prefer a well-cushioned ride with a touch of speed. The PWRRUN+ midsole offers a smooth and responsive experience.
For Classic Cushioned Comfort:
- Brooks Glycerin 20: Suited for runners seeking classic, cushioned comfort. The DNA Loft v3 midsole provides a soft and bouncy feel, making it suitable for various types of runs.
Runner Profiles:
- Saucony Ride 17: Recommended for daily training or recovery days, especially for runners who enjoy a softer feel.
- Brooks Glycerin 20: Ideal for those who prioritize comfort and cushioning, making it suitable for intermediate runners on recovery or long run days.
Ultimately, the decision between the two comes down to individual preferences and the specific needs of the runner. Both models offer reliable performance, and choosing the right one depends on whether you prioritize responsiveness and speed or prioritize maximum cushioning and comfort.
Top 5 Questions and Answers
Which shoe is more suitable for long-distance runs?
Both the Saucony Ride and Brooks Glycerin are well-suited for long-distance runs. The choice depends on the runner’s preference for a softer or classic cushioned feel.
Is there a significant weight difference between the two models?
The Saucony Ride is slightly lighter than the Brooks Glycerin, which may appeal to those who prioritize lighter footwear.
Are there any issues with the lacing systems on these shoes?
The Saucony Ride may experience lacing issues with tabs coming loose during tying. The Brooks Glycerin doesn’t have notable lacing issues but may have a roomy toe box.
Which shoe offers better stability during runs?
The Saucony Ride provides stability with its wider midfoot platform, making it suitable for neutral runners seeking a comfortable and stable ride.
Can these shoes handle different types of surfaces?
Both models perform well on roads, but the Saucony Ride has improved traction. The Brooks Glycerin may feel blocky on certain surfaces due to its substantial rubber outsole.