Brooks Hyperion vs Ghost – Road Running Shoe Review

Performance Summary

Brooks Sports, Inc. stands as one of the most enduring running shoe brands in the market. Since its inception in 1914 by John Brooks Goldenberg, the company’s roots can be traced back to Philadelphia. With over a century of experience under its belt, there’s no doubt that the brand has amassed invaluable insights into the realm of running shoes. In fact, their imprint was so profound that in 2017, they commanded an impressive 25% share of the running shoe market in the United States.

The brand boasts a well-established and highly respected lineup that zeroes in on road running shoes. In this review, I’ll delve into a comparison between two of their models with contrasting histories: the Brooks Hyperion vs Ghost. The Hyperion, representing one of the latest additions to their range, stands in stark contrast to the well-known Brooks Ghost. Having personally tested Ghost numerous times over the years I was excited to get my hands, and feet on the Hyperion.  So after almost 200 miles of testing, below is an in depth review and comparison of each.

Brooks Hyperion

Upon unboxing the Brooks Hyperion, my initial impression was drawn to their aesthetics, boasting a nearly minimalistic design. Apart from the captivating two-tone soles, which I personally find quite appealing, one could easily mistake them for a different brand. However, this semblance became clearer as I lifted them. These shoes exude an exceptional lightweight quality. Even in my hands, I could instinctively sense their potential for speed, a testament to their deliberate design to reduce weight.

Once I got them on my feet, that same impression of a lightweight and minimalist construct seamlessly transitioned. It is essential to note that if you’re looking for a plush cushioned running experience, the Brooks Hyperion is probably not right for you. Additionally, I found them to be relatively narrow, leaving me yearning for a half-size larger. A suggestion I extend to others with average to wide feet. As someone with a medium arch, the arch support appeared noticeably minimal, a characteristic that certainly stood out. To contemplate using an insert for additional support crossed my mind, especially when considering extensive training runs. However, this design choice, I believe, fundamentally contributes to the shoe’s overall lightweight composition.

Embarking on a run in the Brooks Hyperion offered me invaluable insights into the shoe’s design philosophy. The emphasis on a lightweight structure significantly aids in smooth turnovers and seamless transitions. Catering explicitly to runners covering shorter distances and those who thrive on speed. These shoes appear tailor-made for individuals seeking an entry-level, race-day footwear option. Having said this, from my personal standpoint as someone who runs a lot of training miles, these shoes would not be my preferred choice for training purposes. Furthermore, if you fall into the category of a heavier runner, it would be prudent to explore an alternative model boasting heightened cushioning. Overall I can confidently affirm that the Brooks Hyperion stands as an exceptional shoe meticulously crafted to serve its intended purpose and caters to a specific group of runners. EVen if I’m not in that target group.

Brooks Ghost 

This isn’t my first time testing the Brooks Ghost, but it was my inaugural experience with the 15s. Upon unboxing them, I was immediately impressed by the design. That’s one of the advantages of opting for a model that has been in circulation as long as the Ghost. Over time, they’ve refined the design aesthetic and expanded the range of color options. Catering to a wide array of tastes. Despite being noticeably heavier than the Hyperion, they don’t give off a bulky vibe. Likely due to their well-managed weight distribution. The added cushioning and traction are evident even before they’re on your feet.

When I laced them up for the first time, they felt great under my feet. The cushioning is abundant but not overly soft – striking the right balance. Concerning width, they maintain a true-to-size feel, providing a snug fit. Unless you possess wider feet, there’s likely no need to consider going up a half size. The arch support complimented my medium arch perfectly, and in conjunction with the cushioning, is probably why they felt so good when I first put them on. My only minor reservation pertains to the 11 mm drop, which, in my view, is somewhat excessive for a cushioned runner. This attribute is usually something I associate with lighter racing shoes.

Taking to the road in the Ghosts, I quickly understood the basis for the numerous stellar reviews this version has garnered. The weight feels optimal for the level of cushioning offered, leading to a satisfying rebound effect upon impact. Additionally, the traction is commendable. Exhibiting dependable performance on wet pavement, and even suitability for well-maintained / buffed out trails. My sole critique remains the elevated 11 mm drop. While it contributes to a perception of speed, this isn’t always desirable during extensive training runs. Consequently, I’d recommend them primarily for short to mid-distance runners, encompassing up to 10 miles or half-marathon training. Marathon enthusiasts might be better served by a lower drop in their training shoes.

Image Comparison

Looking at the Brooks Hyperion vs Ghost you can clearly see the difference in size. With the added traction of the Ghost even showing from the profile view.

Brooks Hyperion Profile

Brooks Ghost Profile

From above you can really see the difference of the two shoes in width. The Ghost is noticeably wider than the Hyperion through the back and mid section of the shoe.

Hyperion Top View

Ghost Top View

These two shoes have very different soles. With the Hyperion being much slicker for less friction. While the Ghost has ample traction for most road situations including wet ground.

Brooks Hyperion Soles

Brooks Ghost Soles

Conclusion – Brooks Hyperion vs Ghost

Brooks Running is known for its high-quality road running shoes, and both of these models are no different. That said, it’s clear to me that when comparing the Hyperion vs Ghost, they were designed for different purposes.

The Hyperion is lightweight with minimal cushioning, along with a slick sole to reduce friction. To me, they scream entry-level race shoes, perfect for runners looking for an affordable shoe for any distance up to a half marathon. However, I would be hesitant to wear them for a lot of training miles.

While the Ghost provides the perfect amount of cushioning for both mid to longer distances, and will reduce the impact effects of running a lot of training miles. That said, the large drop makes me think they are more designed for half marathon training, where you will be running 40+ mile weeks. So, which one would I buy?

Which road running shoe to buy?

Like most shoes designed for different purposes, this really comes down to what you are looking for in a road runner. For me, as someone who runs a lot of low and slow training miles with speed work mixed in, I’m going with the Brooks Ghost. I feel it is the better shoe for the majority of runners. And if you are a heavier runner, then the Ghost is by far the better choice.

Now, on the other hand, if you are looking for an affordable race day shoe – something meant to be lightweight and fast – then the Hyperion really fits the bill nicely. You may just want to think about going half a size up.