Today, we’ll be comparing two wildly popular trail running shoe models: the Brooks Cascadia vs. Hoka Torrent. One is an extra-cushioned trail monster with ample protection from rocks and enough grip for almost any terrain. The other is a light and agile trail speedster designed to go fast while providing a firm feel for the trail under your feet. But which one is right for you? Below, we’ll break down the key differences, specs, share photos, and review their performance on the trail.
Brooks Cascadia vs Hoka Torrent
- Both models are neutral running shoes. And are not designed for people looking for help preventing under or overpronation.
- The Hoka Torrent is the lighter of the two shoes. Weighing roughly 2 oz lighter than the Brooks.
- With the Brooks Cascadia being the more noticeably cushioned of the two. The Torrent’s cushion is more light and responsive.
- I found the Cascadia also had more overall “foot / rock” protection. Which probably also adds to the heavier weight.
- There is a more aggressive drop on the Cascadia, with an 8mm drop. Compared to a 5 mm drop on the Torrents.
- That said, the Hoka Torrent sit slightly higher with a 31 mm stack height. Verses a 29 mm stack height on the Brooks Cascadia.
- For traction the Cascadia’s have slightly larger, 5 mm lugs. While the Hoka Torrent still has a good 4mm lug size.
Brooks Cascadia 16
MSRP Price: $130
Men’s Link: Click Here
Women’s Link: Click Here
Men’s Weight: 10.5oz / 297.7g
Women’s Weight: 9.5oz / 269.3g
Drop: 8 mm
Stack Height: 29 mm / 21 mm
Stability: Neutral
Cushioning: Plush
Lug size: 5mm Lugs
Hoka Torrent 3
MSRP Price: $125
Men’s Link: Click Here
Women’s Link: Click Here
Men’s Weight: 8.7 oz
Women’s Weight: 7.5 oz
Drop: 5mm
Stack Height: 31 mm / 26 mm
Stability: Neutral
Cushioning: Minimal/Responsive
Lug Size: 4 mm Multi Directional Lugs
Performance Summary
Founded in 1914, Brooks has been producing running shoes for a considerable period, known for eschewing design trends and earning a reputation for durable footwear. Initially focusing on road running shoes, the brand has gradually expanded its trail running lineup over the years. On the other hand, Hoka is a relatively new entrant in the running scene, quickly becoming one of the fastest-growing running shoe companies globally. They’ve built a reputation for their highly cushioned running shoes, including the legendary “Speedgoat” trail running shoes.
Both of these brands have a lot to offer, making it easy to understand why many people compare the Brooks Cascadia vs. Hoka Torrent. Below, I’ll share my experience with each of the shoes and provide my closing thoughts on which I would choose.
Brooks Cascadia
Straight out of the box, the Brooks Cascadia is an aesthetically pleasing trail runner, offering a wide selection of color options to suit various styles. Even before putting them on, the aggressive 5mm lugs and added rock protection contribute to a rugged look and feel. However, they do carry some extra weight compared to lighter trail runners.
On the feet, the shoes appear to run true to size, except for the toe box. In the 16s, the toe box feels slightly oversized, which might work for some people but is worth noting. If you prefer a large toe box, these should fit you well. The arch support felt good for my medium to low arch, but those with a very high arch may want to explore another model.
Hitting the trails in the Brooks Cascadia, I was impressed with the overall cushioning and a surprising amount of traction. They excelled at gripping rocks while running and transitioned well between hiking uphill and running downhill. My few complaints would be the lack of rebound, and I didn’t feel they had a great turnover. Additionally, I had concerns that going half a size up for width might make the toe box too large, but this would only be an issue for certain feet after covering significant miles.
Hoka Torrent
Transitioning to the Hoka Torrent, I’m a fan of the new design of the Torrent 3, featuring a color wave splashed across the side. They feel light in hand, and at a total weight of 8.6 oz, they are indeed lightweight while maintaining an aggressive trail look. With 4mm multidirectional lugs and a sleek single-layer mesh upper, these shoes exude speed even before you put them on.
Putting them on, the Torrents have a snug feel through the midfoot and heel, continuing with what I would consider a narrow/smaller toe box. For me, going half a size up is the way to go. In terms of arch support, there’s a decent amount, suitable for most medium to somewhat high arches.
On the trail, the Torrents are undoubtedly light and fast, offering some cushioning. If you want to feel the trail and be confident with every step, their superbly responsive design and incredible grip have you covered. However, hitting a rock the wrong way may result in feeling it. While they excel in distances up to 50k, for longer distances or if you’re considering longer hikes, you might want to explore a different option.
Brooks Cascadia Profile
Hoka Torrent Profile
Cascadia 16 Back
Torrent Back View
From the top you can see the smaller toe box of the Torrent when compared to the Cascadia.
Cascadia Top
Torrent Top View
Brooks Cascadia Soles
Hoka Torrent Soles
Conclusion – Brooks Cascadia vs Hoka Torrent
When comparing the Brooks Cascadia vs. Hoka Torrent, each excels in certain aspects and has its limitations. In the end, it becomes clear that the two are designed for different purposes. The Cascadia stands out as a more robust, cushioned, and protected trail runner/hiking shoe, featuring a noticeably wide toe box. On the other hand, the Torrent is a streamlined speedster with excellent breathability and traction. It’s fast but runs narrow through the toe box and offers little in the way of rock protection. So, which one to choose?
Which One Should I Buy?
For the majority of people, I believe the Cascadia is the better choice. It provides the cushion needed for a good trail runner and makes an even better hiking shoe. The overall fit, with a true-to-size midfoot and a larger toe box, aligns more with what people are looking for. It’s also an excellent choice for those seeking a through-hiking shoe.
On the other hand, if you desire an aggressive shoe designed for speed, the Torrent is worth considering. I personally use them as my race shoes and am a huge fan, especially for Spartan Race and OCR due to their excellent drainage capabilities.
If you have comments on either of these two shoes, let me know in the comments below.